home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT2401>
- <title>
- Sep. 18, 1989: Opening The Door To Kids
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Sep. 18, 1989 Torching The Amazon
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- LAW, Page 75
- Opening the Door to Kids
- </hdr><body>
- <p>A new federal housing law benefits families with children
- </p>
- <p> When Patricia Godbee went to look for a two-bedroom
- apartment in Tampa last April, she got a rude surprise. The
- leasing agent at the upscale Pavillions housing complex at
- Ballast Point, she claims, refused to show her an apartment upon
- learning that she had a six-year-old son. "I wasn't even given
- an application form," she says. Apparently, Godbee was not
- alone. Other parents, who like her had used the housing-referral
- services at nearby MacDill Air Force Base, complained that they
- too had been given the cold shoulder by Pavillions.
- </p>
- <p> Enter the Justice Department with a bias suit. The legal
- handle: a new amendment to the Fair Housing Act that bars
- sellers or renters of housing from discriminating against
- families with children under 18. Pavillions, once an adult
- complex, denies breaking the law, which took effect in March.
- </p>
- <p> The Tampa case, which is still under litigation, is the
- latest in a boomlet of suits filed by the Government under the
- updated housing statute. Says Attorney General Dick Thornburgh:
- "A new era has begun. We are committed to a fair but firm
- enforcement of the new law." In New Jersey the department has
- already obtained a pro-children settlement against LaFonge
- Associates, operator of the Somerset Mews in Franklin Township.
- The firm agreed to pay $8,000 to one family and $25,000 to the
- Housing Coalition of Middlesex County, which helped investigate
- the case. The department is currently pursuing other cases in
- New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The law exempts most
- housing intended for the elderly from its child-discrimination
- provisions. But the Department of Housing and Urban Development,
- which also has power to enforce the law, has so far received
- some 100 complaints from Florida alone -- virtually all of them
- raising questions about the contours of the exemption.
- </p>
- <p> Housing discrimination against children is a widespread
- phenomenon. The 1980 study that helped lay the basis for the
- federal law indicated that 26% of the rental units in the
- country had adult-only policies, and that many others imposed
- arbitrary restrictions on the number, sex or age of youngsters.
- Sixteen states now have their own laws against such bias. "There
- is a real need to protect families with children," says
- California Representative Don Edwards, a leading sponsor of the
- federal measure. "Yuppies are willing to pay more if they can
- park their BMWs at complexes occupied only by people like
- themselves."
- </p>
- <p> Landlord groups claim that anti-discrimination laws are
- unnecessary because the housing supply is large and diverse
- enough to accommodate families with children. They also argue
- that children, with their propensity to break windows and
- trample shrubbery, can pump up operating costs. Moreover, many
- apartment dwellers seek out the tranquillity of a child-free
- environment. Says Bobbi Jo Pingor, 26, a resident of the
- Pavillions in Tampa: "I love children, but I don't want to live
- with them."
- </p>
- <p> The law's backers counter that stamping out child
- discrimination will protect one of the most helpless groups in
- society. They maintain that the legislation is needed to help
- countless families who have had to scramble for shelter and
- settle for either inferior or more expensive housing. In some
- desperate cases, families have had to split up temporarily, or
- even go homeless. With this law, child advocates say, the
- Government promises youngsters at least a fairer chance to
- obtain a good roof over their heads.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-